Tuesday, 24 April 2018

The tide is turning on Brexit


Most Britons would now vote to remain in the European Union if there was another referendum held next week. That’s the result of a major UK-wide survey of more than 200,000 readers of local newspapers called The Big Brexit Survey.

Sunday, 15 April 2018

Thursday, 29 March 2018

The day Britain's interests were betrayed


It’s one year ago that Prime Minister Theresa May triggered the Article 50 notice for the UK to leave the EU.

29 March 2017 will not be celebrated in history. It’s the day that Britain’s interests were betrayed.
Almost all of Theresa May’s current cabinet, including Mrs May herself, said during the EU referendum campaign that Brexit would damage Britain, make us poorer, put our security at risk, and could undo our own union of the four countries of the United Kingdom.
But the Prime Minister and her ministers went ahead with Brexit anyway, against their own strong advice to the nation not to.
This is how I reported the triggering of Article 50 this time last year:

TRIGGER HAPPY THERESA HAS BETRAYED THE COUNTRY

SHE’S GONE AND BLOODY DONE IT – the one thing she said just one year ago would not be in Britain’s best interests. She’s triggered Brexit.
Theresa May has gone against her own advice that Britain shouldn’t leave the EU.
Not just her advice. But the strong advice of 70% of her cabinet ministers, who also less than a year ago urged the country not to Brexit.
Why are they doing it? Because people told them to? Does that make any sense? If people told you to jump off a cliff, would you do it? Would you volunteer to do it?
Because Mrs May and most of her cabinet have volunteered to do something they all said would be bad for Britain. In doing so, they are betraying our country.
They are doing something that, by their own admission, will not be in the nation’s best interests, but on the contrary, most definitely against our interests.
Two-faced Theresa today formally wrote to the European Union to trigger Article 50, starting two-years of gruelling divorce proceedings that could forever ruin our relations with the mainland of our continent.
She should listen once again to the speech she gave on 25 April last year. Then she said:
“I believe it is clearly in our national interest to remain a member of the European Union.”
And she also said then:
“My judgement, as Home Secretary, is that remaining a member of the European Union means we will be more secure from crime and terrorism.”
As for replacing the trade we do with the EU with other markets, she asserted that this would be an unrealistic route. She said:
“We export more to Ireland than we do to China, almost twice as much to Belgium as we do to India, and nearly three times as much to Sweden as we do to Brazil. It is not realistic to think we could just replace European trade with these new markets.”
And there were other serious risks too.
“If we do vote to leave the European Union, we risk bringing the development of the single market to a halt, we risk a loss of investors and businesses to remaining EU member states driven by discriminatory EU policies, and we risk going backwards when it comes to international trade.”
And other risks too.
“Outside the EU, for example, we would have no access to the European Arrest Warrant, which has allowed us to extradite more than 5,000 people from Britain to Europe in the last five years, and bring 675 suspected or convicted wanted individuals to Britain to face justice.”
And leaving the EU, she said, could lead to the disintegration of the EU, resulting in “massive instability” with “real consequences for Britain.”
In addition, Brexit might prove fatal to “the Union between England and Scotland”, which she did not want to happen.
And if Britain left the EU, she argued, we might not be successful in negotiating a successful divorce settlement.
Explained Mrs May,:
“In a stand-off between Britain and the EU, 44 per cent of our exports is more important to us than eight per cent of the EU’s exports is to them.”
She added, “The reality is that we do not know on what terms we would win access to the single market.
“We do know that in a negotiation we would need to make concessions in order to access it, and those concessions could well be about accepting EU regulations, over which we would have no say, making financial contributions, just as we do now, accepting free movement rules, just as we do now, or quite possibly all three combined.
“It is not clear why other EU member states would give Britain a better deal than they themselves enjoy.”
And in summary, Mrs May said:
“Remaining inside the European Union does make us more secure, it does make us more prosperous and it does make us more influential beyond our shores.”
Most of Theresa May’s cabinet were of the same view: Leaving the EU would be against Britain’s interests, it would represent a disaster for our country.
• Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond said: We will be safer, stronger and better off if we remain in the EU.
 Home Secretary Amber Rudd said: I passionately believe it is best for us all and our country if we remain a member of the EU.
• Justice Secretary Liz Truss said: I don’t want my daughters to grow up in a world where they need a visa or permit to work in Europe.
• Defence Secretary, Michael Fallon said: Make no mistake – a vote to Leave would be payday for Putin.
• Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt said: We will be better off and more secure by remaining in the European Union.
• Education Secretary, Justine Greening said: Staying in the EU is smart diplomacy and smart economics.
• Culture Secretary, Karen Bradley said: If you want a stronger, safer, better off Britain, then the positive choice is to vote Remain.
• Work and Pensions Secretary Damian Green said: Leaving the EU would cause huge economic damage.
And so on, ad nauseam. The Prime Minister, and the majority of her government ministers, strongly urged Britain to remain in the EU in the interests of the country’s prosperity and security.
So, what’s happened to them all? Were they stupid then and clever now?
No.
Before the referendum, these politicians said what they sincerely believed to be in the best interests of Britain. But after the referendum, these politicians are saying and doing what they insincerely believe will be in the best interests of themselves.
Future history books will have a collective noun for them. Hypocrites.
Fortunately, it will prove to be their downfall.

Unfortunately, it’s likely to lead to our country’s downfall too.

______________________________________________________
Other articles by Jon Danzig:


Follow my journalism page on Facebook: Jon Danzig writes
Follow my Stop Brexit campaign on Facebook: Reasons2Remain
_________________________________________________________

• Join and share the discussion about this article on Facebook:


Two-faced Brexit


Brexit has two-faced double-standards and nobody knows what or who to believe.

Sunday, 25 March 2018

Saturday, 24 March 2018

Friday, 23 March 2018

Why the EU referendum was flawed


If the EU referendum had been run with the same rules as Scotland’s first referendum on devolution, the Leave vote would still have won – but Brexit would not now be happening.

Sunday, 18 March 2018

Film coming soon: Postcards from the 48%


Remain supporters, we’re in for a treat. The full-length documentary, Postcards from the 48%, is in its final stages of production and I’ve been privileged to watch a preview 'fine cut' of the film. It’s superb.

Saturday, 3 March 2018

Theresa May's Brexit double act


In her keynote Brexit speech on Friday, the Prime Minister Theresa May tried to pull a fast one on the British people and our European neighbours. 

Monday, 26 February 2018

The politics of cake


Unfortunately, both the Prime Minister, Theresa May, and the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, want the same thing. Cake.