The next day, on 23 January, Health Secretary Matt Hancock told Parliament that the risk had been revised from ‘very low’ to ‘low’.
He said then of the coronavirus:
“The public can be assured that the whole of the UK is always well prepared for these types of outbreaks..”And:
“The NHS is ready to respond appropriately to any cases that emerge.”Mr Hancock added:
“The UK is one of the first countries to have developed a world-leading test for the new coronavirus.”
A week later, the World Health Organisation declared the novel coronavirus outbreak
‘a public health emergency of international concern.’On 12 March, the WHO announced that Covid-19 was a global pandemic, with Europe at its centre. ▪ WHAT A LOT HAS CHANGED IN 80 DAYS We’ve gone from zero known cases in mid-January to almost 80,000 known cases today, and so far 10,672 registered hospital deaths from the Covid-19 virus, with new hospital deaths at the rate of almost 1,000 a day. Of course, these numbers don’t give the full picture. Despite Mr Hancock’s boast in January that the UK was one of the first to develop a “world-leading test” for the virus, we’ve lagged behind other countries on testing for Covid-19. The UK policy has been only to test patients for coronavirus who are seriously ill in hospital from the disease, whereas NHS health workers, and those in the population with symptoms of coronavirus, have not been routinely tested, as they are in Germany. Promises to achieve 100,000 tests a day by the end of this month look like just more grandstanding by a government chronically prone to promise more than it can deliver. Currently, barely 20,000 tests are being done each day in Britain – a number only recently reached. Furthermore, the number of known deaths from Covid-19 is bound to be grossly understated. The data so far only includes deaths registered in hospitals, with registration often delayed. The numbers of deaths reported each day don’t include those who have died from coronavirus at home or in care homes. ▪ SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN BETTER PREPARED? Yes, of course. The Cabinet Office’s document from 2013 called, ‘Preparing for a Pandemic Influenza’ (coronavirus is similar to a pandemic flu virus) stated:
‘The Government judges that one of the highest current risks to the UK is the possible emergence of an influenza pandemic – that is, the rapid worldwide spread of influenza caused by a novel virus strain to which people would have no immunity, resulting in more serious illness than caused by seasonal influenza.’The planning then was to prepare for a pandemic with “excess deaths” of between 210,000 and 315,000 over a 15-week period, representing a mortality rate of 2.5% from a new pandemic virus. That’s considerably worse than the direst predictions for Covid-19, for which the Chief Medical Officer, Professor Whitty, has anticipated a mortality rate of no higher than 1% (which, incidentally, is a death rate ten times greater than seasonal flu). So, considering that recent past governments were aware that a new, devastating global pandemic would come to the UK at some stage (we have on average three every 100 years) and that we should be ready for one that could involve considerably more deaths than those foreseen for Covid-19, you’d think that our government would be more than prepared for the arrival of the coronavirus pandemic. But no. Our country, which was assessed by the WHO back in 2009 to be the most prepared in the world for a global pandemic alongside France, was caught almost completely by surprise. We were NOT prepared... ▪ WE WERE DEVASTATINGLY UNPREPARED Even when our government at last realised that Covid-19 was likely to be the big pandemic that past governments had been anxiously awaiting, their actions were entirely inappropriate. The government promoted a false sense of security by describing the virus as mild for most people, who could shake it off quickly and thereafter gain immunity from it. This ‘herd immunity’* policy has been discredited as grotesque and unethical, as it would have led to huge numbers of deaths.
The herd immunity idea was nonetheless endorsed and promoted by the UK’s Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance.
The potential consequences of pursuing a policy of ‘herd immunity’ are truly shocking, with a minimum of 36 million in the UK needing to be infected, leading to possibly hundreds of thousands of deaths and many needing critical care. To the astonishment of health experts across the world, including the WHO, the UK seriously proposed their policy that most people in the UK should catch the virus so that they would become immune from it. All without sound scientific evidence to support this strategy, and considerable evidence that it would kill an awful lot of us. As The National Geographic pointed out:#COVID19 1-MINUTE VIDEO. Achieving 'herd immunity' was #UKGOV policy to tackle #coronavirus. It was dropped because the science didn't support it. Neither did #humanrights nor morality. Read my report on Facebook: https://t.co/cpwKXzGnlY On LinkedIn: https://t.co/YELrjc4dN1 pic.twitter.com/nWj8VrOmHk— Jon Danzig (@Jon_Danzig) March 23, 2020
‘While countries around the world began to lock down workplaces, schools, and public gatherings in response to the rapidly spreading coronavirus, the United Kingdom’s initial strategy [herd immunity] sent many into an uproar.’Britain lost precious time in the battle against Covid-19 with its immoral herd immunity policy, and we still haven’t caught up.
- [*UPDATE: According an 'exclusive' report in Byline Times, 'herd immunity' is still the government's 'secret policy'.]
______________________________________________________
▪ PLEASE NOTE: I am currently offering my community journalism here for free. I derive no earnings or funding from this, and certainly no income from clicks or advertising. My motivation is to report verifiable facts, regardless of whether I like those facts or not.
______________________________________________________
▪ PLEASE NOTE: I am currently offering my community journalism here for free. I derive no earnings or funding from this, and certainly no income from clicks or advertising. My motivation is to report verifiable facts, regardless of whether I like those facts or not.
______________________________________________________
Other articles by Jon Danzig:
Follow my journalism page on Facebook: Jon Danzig writes
On LinkedIn: Jon Danzig profile
_________________________________________________________
- Join the discussion about this article on Facebook and Twitter:
#COVID19: Now published on my blog: How the UK was DEVASTATINGLY UNPREPARED for the #coronavirus #pandemic, and wasted precious time on an immoral policy of ‘herd immunity’. https://t.co/HskOy28EbI— Jon Danzig (@Jon_Danzig) April 12, 2020